Haskell record syntax is a bit verbose. For records with many fields, it is tiresome to write each field individually in a record pattern, as in
data C = C {a :: Int, b :: Int, c :: Int, d :: Int}
f (C {a = 1, b = b, c = c, d = d}) = b + c + d
Record wildcard syntax lets us use ..
in a record pattern, which simplifies pattern f=f
to f
. The above pattern can be rewritten with record wildcards syntax
f (C {a = 1, ..}) = b + c + d
This simple example does not show the merit of record wildcards vividly. Let’s see a real world example. hs-java is a package written by Ilya V. Portnov, which provides data types for Java .class files format and functions to assemble/disassemble Java bytecode.
The datatype for a JVM class file is Class
, which has many fields as in
data Class stage = Class {
magic :: Word32, -- ^ Magic value: 0xCAFEBABE
minorVersion :: Word16,
majorVersion :: Word16,
constsPoolSize :: Word16, -- ^ Number of items in constants pool
constsPool :: Pool stage, -- ^ Constants pool itself
accessFlags :: AccessFlags stage, -- ^ See @JVM.Types.AccessFlag@
thisClass :: Link stage B.ByteString, -- ^ Constants pool item index for this class
superClass :: Link stage B.ByteString, -- ^ --/-- for super class, zero for java.lang.Object
interfacesCount :: Word16, -- ^ Number of implemented interfaces
interfaces :: [Link stage B.ByteString], -- ^ Constants pool item indexes for implemented interfaces
classFieldsCount :: Word16, -- ^ Number of class fileds
classFields :: [Field stage], -- ^ Class fields
classMethodsCount :: Word16, -- ^ Number of class methods
classMethods :: [Method stage], -- ^ Class methods
classAttributesCount :: Word16, -- ^ Number of class attributes
classAttributes :: Attributes stage -- ^ Class attributes
}
It is declared as an instance of Binary class for serialization. Its put method uses the record wildcards syntax not to repeat field names as in the following:
instance Binary (Class File) where
put (Class {..}) = do
put magic
put minorVersion
put majorVersion
putPool constsPool
put accessFlags
put thisClass
put superClass
put interfacesCount
forM_ interfaces put
put classFieldsCount
forM_ classFields put
put classMethodsCount
forM_ classMethods put
put classAttributesCount
forM_ (attributesList classAttributes) put
You can see the real difference by comparing this with a more verbose version which does not use record wildcards.
instance Binary (Class File) where
put (Class {magic=magic, minorVersion=minorVersion, majorVersion=majorVersion, constsPool=constsPool, accessFlags=accessFlags, thisCla ss=thisClass, superClass=superClass, interfacesCount=interfacesCount, interfaces=interfaces, classFieldsCount=classFieldsCount, classFie lds=classFields, classMethodsCount=classMethodsCount, classMethods=classMethods, classAttributesCount=classAttributesCount, classAttributes=classAttributes}) = do
...